Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use this network.

Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.

Strood Conservatives

Conservatives in Strood (Medway)

Bonfire of the Quangos!

There's an interesting blog on the Telegraph website which names a number of lobby groups who are all paid for from the public purse. This is the list from the Telegraph;

Bath & North East Somerset Racial Equality Council
Black & Minority Ethnic Carers Support Service
Camden & Westminster Refugee Training Partnership (C&WRTP)
Consortium of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender voluntary and Community Organisations
Gypsy/Travel Education & Information Project North East (GTEIP)
MOSAIC Black & Mixed Parentage Family Group
National Council for One Parent Families|Gingerbread
North Yorkshire Black and Minority Ethnic Strategy Board
Pakistan Community Association and Multicultural Advice Centre

Now, I ask you. Do any of these really represent a good use of public money? And should the public, through their taxes, be expected to pay money to lobby groups such as these without having any say in their funding?

I think not. The great problem we have in this country is the way the 'third sector' and lobby groups has expanded under Labour since 1997. For instance, in 1997 the amount of funding given to quangos was £97billion a year (which was already too high in my humble opinion). Fast forward 12 years and under this Labour government and we now see that the amount of taxpayers' money given to these unelected and unaccountable quangos has risen to approximately £200billion a year.

That's £200 billion pounds of my money and your money being handed out to various groups and institutions who we are funding, who then in turn use that money to put pressure on the government to change laws that don't need changing in the first place!

It's like some self-perpuating money fest all paid for by you and me, and that has got to stop.

My own personal favourite is the Milk Development Council (MDC), a publicly-funded quango set up to promote the interests of dairy farmers. In 1997 the MDC employed just four people (and even that seems like too may to me). So it should come as no surprise that in 2009 the MDC has somehow now morphed into an organisation that requires 44 people to be employed at the taxpayers' expense.

Why???? Are we drinking more milk than we did in 1997 due to the increased and enlarged presence of the MDC? Are our dairy farmers faring any better due to the engorged MDC?

Well, there's no doubt that the dairy farmers of the UK are certainly paying for the profligacy of this Labour government in terms of more red tape, higher taxes and harsher trading conditions so you would have to say no.

The plain fact of the matter is that the next Conservative government MUST get a handle on the growth of third sector and taxpayer funded quangos who are all suckling on the taxpayers' tit. Just scaling back the cost of the unelected and unaccountable back to 1997 levels would give the country an expenditure saving of approx £100billion a year, which would almost certainly give us a roadmap out of the current recession and put the public finances on a sounder footing.

This must be a priority if/when the next Conservative government is elected. It's time to bite the bullet and put the taxpayer first in favour of these self-interest pressure groups.

About This Discussion

Started 25 May by:

Chris Irvine Chris Irvine
View Discussions »

Replies to This Discussion

John M Ward

Permalink Reply by John M Ward 27 May
 

It is rather like all those so-called "charities" who also receive a lot of public funding — in some cases it is the greatest part of their income. Indeed, a few in your list might also have charitable status. They too act as lobby groups, some of which might be strictly legit for all I know; but it does look distinctly odd and is largely a recent change.

All of this appears to be social engineering of one kind or another, manipulating the structure and nature of our society in pursuance of a particular (Communist-style) goal. It is, as you say, something that must be tackled by an incoming Conservative government, and both categories specifically dealt with so that none of those whose public funding needs to be curtailed can avoid that being done by shifting its nature into one or the other camp.

If I were in that position, I'd take the opportunity to not only reverse the changes of the past twelve years, but at the same time to do something about the rest of that public funding that was already there by 1997. Especially in the present economic climate, the country could do with that extra £200 billion per year.
Reply to This
Chris Irvine

Permalink Reply by Chris Irvine 27 May
 

I'm sure many of them are working with a common purpose.
Reply to This
John M Ward

Permalink Reply by John M Ward 28 May
 

Oh yes: that too! (as Vir said in Parliament of Dreams, by the way) That is probably the primary driver behind all of this cultural manipulation — all part of the Master Plan.
Reply to This
Chris Irvine

Permalink Reply by Chris Irvine 6 Jul
 

Seems Mr Cameron is an avid reader of the Strood Conservatives website. This is very welcome.

David Cameron has set out plans to increase democratic accountability by reducing the number of quangos.
In a speech to the Reform think tank, David announced that some powers will be handed back to Ministers, some quangos will be reformed and slimmed down, and others – including Ofcom and the Qualifications, Curriculum and Development Agency - will cease to exist in their current form.

He stressed, "The problem today is that too much of what government does is actually done by people that no-one can vote out, by organisations that feel no pressure to answer for what happens and in a way that is relatively unaccountable."

The policy-making functions of Ofcom – such as deciding the future of local news and Channel 4 – will be handed back to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport; and the responsibilities of the Qualifications, Curriculum and Development Agency will be transferred to the Department for Children Schools and Families.

David explained that the Shadow Cabinet are reviewing every independent public body that exists in their department to see if they “perform a technical, fairness or transparency function.”

And he stressed that reforming quangos is "vital" to fix our broken politics and "bring real people power" to every aspect of political life:

"We want people to know that when Conservative politicians stand up and make promises, they're prepared to take responsibility and won't end up passing the buck. We want people to know that with a Conservative government, they will have more power, more control, more say over the things that matter to them. And above all we want people to know that change is possible; that things can be different; that they can make a difference."

Read David's speech on reforming quangos
Reply to This

RSS Feed - Subscribe to this discussion

Existing Members: Sign In

Forgot Password?

Members

Chris Irvine
John M Ward
Hugh Jorgan
Gov Bhandari
Jim kremnin
Alan W Collins

Ephraim Duncan
Col_M
John Avey
timforchange
Jane Etheridge
Caroline Brown

Julia Maning
Gary Etheridge
Barbara Webb
Wen Liu
Victoria Ayling
Tony Lit

Melanie Hampton
Martin Macdonald
Vikas
Laura Etheridge
wayne king
Janice Small

This is a MOGsite!

Created by MOGmedia
Want UK SEO Hosting?

Get a Strood Conservatives Badge!

Show your allegiance! Get a Strood Conservatives badge to put on your website or MySpace page. (Get Code)

SEO and SEM Search Engine Marketing Kent provide online marketing.

Domain from Create a Dot Com MOG media.